Suckers at Top ( Excerpts from True Facts and Studies of The Nehru Dynasty.)

At the very beginning of his book, THE NEHRU DYNASTY, astrologer K.N.Rao
mentions the names of Jawahar Lal's father and grandfather. Jawahar Lal's
father was believed to be Moti Lal and Moti Lal's father was one Gangadhar Nehru. And we all know that Jawahar Lal's only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis. She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage with Feroze. Why? No one tells us that.

Now, who is this Feroze? We are told by many that he was the son of the
family grocer. The grocer supplied wines, etc. to Anand Bhavan, previously known as Ishrat Manzil, which once belonged to a Moslem lawyer named Mobarak Ali.

Moti Lal was earlier an employee of Mobarak Ali. What was the family
grocer's name? One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal grandfathers. In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important
grandfather in most societies. Why is it then no where we find Rajiv
Gandhi's paternal grandfather's name?

It appears that the reason is simply this. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal
grandfather was a Moslem gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat. This
Moslem grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi woman after
converting her to Islam. This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv
being a Parsi was derived.

Rajiv's father Feroze was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against
Kamala Nehru's wishes. Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often
associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his
wedding with Indira, by an affidavit.

The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many
writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan
University by Gurudev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl
was all by herself, while father Jawahar was busy with politics, pretty
women and illicit sex; the mother was in hospital.
Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and he was quite
sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a
Moslem woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque. Nehru was not
happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this marriage
eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi.

Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the
youngman to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with
change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance. It was just a case
of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze
Gandhi. The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon
to be declared India's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation' didn't
mention this game of his in the famous book, 'My Experiments with Truth'.
Why?

When they returned to India, a mock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for
public consumption. On this subject, writes M.O.Mathai (a longtime Private
Secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI)
'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age' on page 94, second paragraph:

"For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed
according to Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste
marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal,
it had to be a civil marriage."

It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived
seperatly, but they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru
frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political activities.
Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime
Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan.Mathai writes that the death of
Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960
before he could consolidate his own political forces, is itself a mystery.
Feroze had even planned to remarry.

Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions
and deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of
Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of
Feroze. He was the son of another Moslem gentleman,Mohammad Yunus. Here, in
passing, we might mention that the second son was originally named Sanjiv.
It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name. It was changed to Sanjay
when he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport
impounded, for having stolen a car. Krishna Menon was then India's High
Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon
who changed his name to Sanjay.

Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they call
her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of Lord Indra's court dancer
rather offensive!) took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus' house
in New Delhi.

And the marriage with Menaka who was a model (She had model for Bombay
Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so ordinary either. Sanjay was
notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered
pregnant by Sanjay. It was then that her father, Colonel Anand, threatened
Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry her daughter. And that
did the trick. Sanjay married Menaka.

It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was not
happy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka; apparently he had wanted to
get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice.

It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane
accident. In Yunus' book, 'Persons, Passions & Politics' one discovers that
baby Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the
reason stated was phimosis. It was always belived that Sanjay used to
blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this she used to turn a blind eye when
Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as though it were his personal
fiefdom. Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father
was?
When the news of Sanjay's death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing she
wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him.

Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. At least one case is very
graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his "Reminiscences of the Nehru
Age", page 206. Mathai writes:

"In the autumn of 1948 (India became free in 1947 and a great deal of work
needed to be done) a young woman from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a
sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real name). She was a
Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and
mythology. People, including MPs,thronged to her to hear her discourses.
One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter in Hindi
from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house. As she
departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, shapely
and beautiful. Meetings with her became rather frequent, mostly after Nehru
finished his work at night.

During one of Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there, and
Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply; and
she visited Nehru at midnight...

"Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared. In November 1949 a convent in
Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters.
He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few
months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or
give any particulars about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was
well enough to move out but left the child behind. She
however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other
things, several letters in Hindi were found.

The Mother Superior, who was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was
told they were from the Prime Minister. The person who brought the letters
surrendered them..."I (Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the
boy but failed to get a clue about his whereabouts. Convents in such
matters are extremely tightlipped and secretive. Had I succeeded in
locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a
Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was."

Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called
Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy.
Rajiv became Roberto. His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul.

Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as
Priyanka and Rahul. What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance
in such matters.

The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as
prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference,

Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi.Mind you, speaking of the
Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His grandmother (father's
mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to
marry Nawab Khan.

It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of
Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington
Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children's encyclopedias
recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered
University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in
the world today!

The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University
Rajiv had not passed a single examination. He had therefore to leave
Cambridge without a certificate. Sonia too had the same benevolent
treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge. Such a description
is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right
but not of the University of Cambridge but of one of those fly by night
language schools where foreign students come to learn English. sonia was
working as an 'au pair' girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at
the same time.

And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per vedic rites in
full view of India's public.

This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now an Italian leads a
prestgious national party because of just one qualification - being married
into the Nerhu family. Maneka Gandhi itself is being accepted by the non
Congress parties not because she was a former model or an anmial lover, but
for her links to the Nehru family.

Saying that an Italian should not lead India will amount to narrow
mindness, but if Sania Maino (Sonia) had served India like say Mother
Teresa or Annie Besant, ie in anyway on her own rights, then all Indians
should be proud of her just as how proud we are of Mother Teresa.
GOD BLESS INDIA.